1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
|
# Week 5
## Lecture
Readings
: - Wouters (2017)
- [Leiden Manifesto](http://www.leidenmanifesto.org/) (2015)
For this session we are honored to welcome Professor **Paul Wouters**, Dean of the Faculty of Social Sciences, who will speak from his vantage point about the ethics and politics of scientific knowledge production. Dean Wouters was a driving force behind the Leiden Manifesto on Research Metrics and, as a scholar of science and technology, he has studied important trends such as open science and mixed-methods research. He will also talk to us about issues that are unique to the Dutch social sciences and our own Faculty.
## Tutorial
Homework
: - Watch the [teaser video](https://pardoguerra.org/quantifiedscholar/) for Juan Pablo Pardo-Guerra's _The Quantified Scholar_.
- Review your notes from last week's lecture and come prepared to discuss what you learned.
Tutorials will be an occasion to discuss specific cases and think through ethical implications of doing research both inside and outside of academic settings.
|
>
>
>
>
|
|
|
<
<
|
<
<
<
|
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
|
# Week 5
## Lecture
Location
: PdlC SC01
Readings
: - Fassin (2013)
- Reyes (2017)
- Dilger et al. (2018)
- De Koning et al. (2019)
Researchers have a responsibility to address issues of public concern, and critical scholars in particular have the ambition of making public interventions. This requires finding formats for scholarly communication that can reach the public, but also resisting tendencies that enclose scholarly knowledge behind paywalls or within proprietary systems. In that sense, ethnographers are champions of opening up our work. The demand to be "open" can also be a challenge to those conducting critical research, particularly for ethnographers who are unable to share their data or be totally transparent about their research process. We will discuss a variety of ethical issues that are at stake in this tension.
**No tutorials this week.**
|