Overview
| Comment: | update description of week 6 |
|---|---|
| Timelines: | family | ancestors | descendants | both | trunk |
| Files: | files | file ages | folders |
| SHA3-256: |
32e63b2e2568439de8bea26b5969ed9a |
| User & Date: | jboy on 2021-04-07 15:06:35 |
| Other Links: | manifest | tags |
Context
|
2021-04-07
| ||
| 19:35 | add FAQ check-in: ef45adad1b user: jboy tags: trunk | |
| 15:06 | update description of week 6 check-in: 32e63b2e25 user: jboy tags: trunk | |
| 15:06 | add Reyes and De Koning et al. readings check-in: 9bb9df5816 user: jboy tags: trunk | |
Changes
Modified docs/weeks/6.md from [1305c0b253] to [7b666423d8].
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 | + + + + + | # Week 6 ## Lecture Readings : - Fassin (2013) - Reyes (2017) - Dilger et al. (2018) - De Koning et al. (2019) Researchers have a responsibility to address issues of public concern, and critical scholars in particular have the ambition of making public interventions. This requires finding formats for scholarly communication that can reach the public, but also resisting tendencies that enclose scholarly knowledge behind paywalls or within proprietary systems. In that sense, ethnographers are champions of opening up our work. The demand to be "open" can also challenge the conduct of critical research, particularly for ethnographers who are unable to share their data or be totally transparent about their research process. We will discuss a variety of ethical issues that are at stake in this tension. ## Tutorial Homework : Review your notes and come prepared with questions. During tutorials, you will discuss [assignment 3](../assignments/3.md). |